youtube films

Forum covering all aspects of small gauge cinematography! This is the main discussion forum.

Moderator: Andreas Wideroe

User avatar
tukon4
Posts: 58
Joined: Sat Mar 11, 2006 8:38 pm
Location: Minneapolis
Contact:

Post by tukon4 »

I just posted a commercial I shot on 64T Super 8. You can watch it here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aCljQk_itT4

Unfortunately, the film to video transfer wasn't that great. I used an 85b filter on the lens which warmed up the image a little too much and then the transfer warmed it up even more, which I corrected a bit in Premiere. The projected image looks much better, especially compared to the transferred and compressed YouTube video version.

Anyways, tell me what you think of the film!
Michael
schoft
Posts: 101
Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 1:53 am
Location: The Netherlands, Western-Europe

Post by schoft »

tukon4 wrote:I just posted a commercial I shot on 64T Super 8. You can watch it here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aCljQk_itT4
I'm shooting my first rolls tomorow in my canon 518 sv autozoom. Good too see some other users with the same camera.
Bart Sanders
Posts: 115
Joined: Wed May 22, 2002 9:53 pm
Location: Netherlands
Contact:

Post by Bart Sanders »

Hi,

Have a look:

Kodak E64T test film:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oDN42ptWN5E

Experimenting with digital post:
http://www.youtube.com/results?search_q ... rch=Search

And another:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aZ79MU4qMEE

Have fun, it's in super8!
pbrstreetgang
Posts: 112
Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2004 1:46 am
Location: queensland australia

Post by pbrstreetgang »

super8france wrote:
I seek lot of bikers and leathermen.
Huh? 8O
ccortez
Senior member
Posts: 2220
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2004 3:07 am
Location: Austin, Texas

Post by ccortez »

is there some consensus (maybe a thread already in existence) about the best workflow and/or codec for going to youtube? i know they do... something... with it once they get a vid. so my question is, what's the best thing to start with before you-tube-ifying it?

forgive me if this makes no sense. i've never done the youtube thing with a clip, but my partner jeff did with some DIY 16mm xfer and he seemed to degrade the original with every choice he made. (and what we had rather sucked to start with.)

http://youtube.com/watch?v=FAg2MmEtgvo

fwiw, this footage was shot by phil rizzuto while on the field with dimaggio and mantle. we bought mr. rizzuto's home movie collection (camera original reversal film) from a sports memoribilia auction. the family movies are really amazing --

- very well composed, focused, etc.;
- solid camera, no unnecessary movement, jerkiness, panning, etc.;
- effective takes and shot lengths, most if not all edited in camera (the few splices look like film breakages rather than editing)
- beautiful color even after all these years (most of this stuff probably shot in the 50s and 60s)

this all seemed true whether shot by him, his wife or his kid(s). video may be "democratizing" but it ain't making folks better at capturing the moments of life...
superotto.40
Posts: 94
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 6:34 pm
Location: Roma-Italy

Post by superotto.40 »

tukon4 wrote:I just posted a commercial I shot on 64T Super 8. You can watch it here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aCljQk_itT4

Unfortunately, the film to video transfer wasn't that great. I used an 85b filter on the lens which warmed up the image a little too much and then the transfer warmed it up even more, which I corrected a bit in Premiere. The projected image looks much better, especially compared to the transferred and compressed YouTube video version.

Anyways, tell me what you think of the film!
Good work,
perhaps a faster assembly would render better together.
however it appeals to the idea to me.

ah...sorry for my bad english
mattias
Posts: 8356
Joined: Wed May 15, 2002 1:31 pm
Location: Gubbängen, Stockholm, Sweden
Contact:

Post by mattias »

320x240 and as big as possible within the limit. there's no gain in using larger sizes since this is what they resize to, and having as little compression as possible is pretty much a no-brainer. i use mpeg-4 and it works great. i tried pjpeg before since i figured an i-frame codec wouldn't lose as much in recompression, but while you get about the same quality as with mpeg-4 it causes gamma shifts in their conversion.

(try "their" conversion yourself. just resize to 320x240 and encode as a 300kb/s flv, i.e. sorenson h.263)

/matt
ccortez
Senior member
Posts: 2220
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2004 3:07 am
Location: Austin, Texas

Post by ccortez »

Thanks, Matt. Will do.
Angus
Senior member
Posts: 3888
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2003 11:22 am
Contact:

Post by Angus »

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o0XCJkWU2qU

Most of the super 8 footage that I shot at the Brooklands Centenary Festival in June.

I tried 320x240 MPEG1, and while it looked OK before I sent it to Youtube, they've made it look quite horrid. Maybe compare with my video shot at the same event, also on Youtube.
The government says that by 2010 30% of us will be fat....I am merely a trendsetter :)
mattias
Posts: 8356
Joined: Wed May 15, 2002 1:31 pm
Location: Gubbängen, Stockholm, Sweden
Contact:

Post by mattias »

Angus wrote:it looked OK before I sent it to Youtube, they've made it look quite horrid
yes, the problem is rarely on your side. if the version you upload looks good you've done all you could. the exception is if you get unexpected artifacts like gamma shifts and jerky images, then you need to consider a different upload format. if it just looks "bad", welcome to youtube. ;-)

/matt
Angus
Senior member
Posts: 3888
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2003 11:22 am
Contact:

Post by Angus »

I may try mpeg4 encoding next time.

The mpeg-1 file looks pretty good, certainly no jerky motion. What I dislike so much about the youtube compressed version is the blockinmess and the fact that it looks out of focus!
The government says that by 2010 30% of us will be fat....I am merely a trendsetter :)
mattias
Posts: 8356
Joined: Wed May 15, 2002 1:31 pm
Location: Gubbängen, Stockholm, Sweden
Contact:

Post by mattias »

Angus wrote:it looks out of focus!
that's because it's encoded as 320x240 but displayed at a higher res, like 400x300 or so. click the little rectangle icon to see it at its native size. much sharper but also, duh, smaller.

/matt
User avatar
HTTK
Posts: 129
Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2005 4:25 am
Location: Missouri, USA
Contact:

Post by HTTK »

Here is my first silent comedy I shot called Swindling Charade that's hosted on youtube.

My other silent film, Lip-Stick, is hosted on onsuper8.org's video podcast. :)

Enjoy guys!Image
User avatar
Scotness
Senior member
Posts: 2630
Joined: Fri Jan 24, 2003 8:58 pm
Location: Sunny Queensland, Australia!
Contact:

Post by Scotness »

Here's mine:

Super 8mm
In My Image preview clip:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZVc-Sl_s-Oc

16mm
Sleeping On Her Couch
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=faV0kQQ2_Ps

Scot
Read my science fiction novel The Forest of Life at https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B01D38AV4K
User avatar
onsuper8
Posts: 644
Joined: Sun Jul 18, 2004 9:32 pm
Location: North West, UK
Contact:

Post by onsuper8 »

Video for Stereolab's track 'Ironman';

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qPDVMV1hte8

Beach Hut animation;

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ARGdlOtA1x4

Both a festival of quilting! Hence us going with Blip.tv for the onsuper8.org podcast - h264 Quicktime is the way to go IMHO!

http://onsuper8.blip.tv/
http://homepage.mac.com/onsuper8/podcast.html
Post Reply