What devices are good for recording the sound tracks?

Forum covering all aspects of small gauge cinematography! This is the main discussion forum.

Moderator: Andreas Wideroe

Post Reply
supermag400_inventor
Posts: 318
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 7:29 am
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Contact:

What devices are good for recording the sound tracks?

Post by supermag400_inventor »

I've been looking over the MP3 recorders and digital recording devices on the market for use as my sound recorder for super 8 films. I have thought of just using the Lap top computer for location shooting, but it requires a sound man to operate while shooting. Then there is the small MP3 recorders that are cheep enough but have no range. Perhaps a mic pre-amp could be used with one.

What suggestions do you have?
danpuddick
Posts: 245
Joined: Sat May 10, 2003 7:10 pm
Location: London

Post by danpuddick »

I would suggest a hi MD recorder http://www.sony.net/Products/Hi-MD/capacity.html http://www.minidisc.org

I think the plus points are -

Uncompressed PCM recording.

USB connection for direct transfer of recorded audio as wav. file to PC.

Cheap removable media, Standard MD discs can store 28 minutes of CD quality uncompressed audio and can be bought for as cheap as a dollar.

Can be used as a portable hard drive for backing up and transporting files

I think one if the biggest plus points with the format is that the media is so cheap you can keep the originals as backups for everything you do.
keep on truckin'
daniel
super8man
Senior member
Posts: 3980
Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2003 11:51 pm
Real name: Michael Nyberg
Location: The Golden State
Contact:

Post by super8man »

check out my website...my minidisc model is there and still highly recommended...then go to minidisc.org to figure it all out.

mike
My website - check it out...
http://super8man.filmshooting.com/
supermag400_inventor
Posts: 318
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 7:29 am
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Contact:

Post by supermag400_inventor »

Yes...I think the mini disk from sony is a great product. I'm thinking that may be the one to use. However, I'm wondering about the microphone to use with it. I know that Sony makes a better quality mic that is designed for use with video cameras and MD's. It sells for about $200 at the electronics store. I think I could get a pro boom mic for less.
User avatar
jpolzfuss
Senior member
Posts: 1657
Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2005 12:16 am

Post by jpolzfuss »

Hi,

the features of the new Hi-MD sound very nice... but I would need a device that could record at least three tracks: Two for the stereo-sound and one for recording the sync-signal from my camera. Until now I've only found tape-recorders that could do this (since I don't want to carry around my laptop). Any ideas?

Jörg
danpuddick
Posts: 245
Joined: Sat May 10, 2003 7:10 pm
Location: London

Post by danpuddick »

Definately go with HiMD model as the standard MD players lack the uncompressed recording and only allow tranfer digitally from a PC to a Disc - not the reverse plus no USB storage for files.

The Sony Sony MZ-RH910 goes for $199 on Amazon - I don't think you can get a standard MD recorder for that much less. Soome are advertised as NetMD - this is just downloading from a PC not any of the features that are really useful for soundtrack recording.
keep on truckin'
daniel
User avatar
jpolzfuss
Senior member
Posts: 1657
Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2005 12:16 am

Post by jpolzfuss »

What is the actual quality of the PCM-recording of those Hi-MD-recorders?

Sony says:
LinearPCM/1.4Mbps

This sounds like the CD-format to me:
44.1kHz; 16 bit; 2 channels

Some other portable digital recorders (data found on the internet and hence might not be 100% correct):

DAT-recorders allow a maximum rate of
48kHz; 16 bit; 2 channels
(some of them even even work at 96 kHz; 24 bit; 2 channels!)

Creative Nomad DAP Jukebox 3 allows a maximum rate of
48kHz; 16 bit; 2 channels

Edirol R-1 MP3/WAV Recorder allows a maximum rate of
44.1 kHz; 24 bit; 2 channels

Edirol R4 MP3/WAV Recorder allows a maximum rate of
96 kHz; 24 bit; 4 channels(!)

Marantz PMD 670 seems to allow a maximum rate of
48kHz; 16 bit; 2 channels

Marantz PMD 671 allows a maximum rate of
96 kHz; 24 bit; 2 channels

Mayah FM 001 Flashman Audiorecorder seems to allow a maximum rate of
48kHz; 16 bit; 2 channels

PMD 660 allows a maximum rate of
48kHz; 16 bit; 2 channels

Denon DN-F20R allows a maximum rate of
48kHz; 24bit; 2 channels

Etc. pp.

In other words: Are those Hi-MD-recorders really the best choice?

Jörg
christoph
Senior member
Posts: 2486
Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2003 2:36 pm
Location: atm Berlin, Germany

Post by christoph »

jpolzfuss wrote:What is the actual quality of the PCM-recording of those Hi-MD-recorders?

Sony says:
LinearPCM/1.4Mbps

This sounds like the CD-format to me:
44.1kHz; 16 bit; 2 channels
spot on!
In other words: Are those Hi-MD-recorders really the best choice?
uhmm.. best for what?
as far as quality goes, they are pretty low end, although 44.1/16 is good enough for most purposes. but the mic preamps are rather noisy and the A/D convertors are not the best either.
the other annoying bit is that all video audio formats (digibeta/dv/dvd) are 48/16 so you have to apply some sample conversion.

but then again, you can have them for under 200bucks, the other formats you listed are most close or over the 1000 mark (the edirol and the nomad being thre exception, but they have their own issues).

and those MD recorders are *really* small :)
++ christoph ++
tim
Posts: 422
Joined: Mon May 06, 2002 8:38 am
Location: Norfolk, UK
Contact:

Post by tim »

Don't dismiss the humble audio cassette recorder. Performance can be very good. Stability is better than you might think. I've tested many, both portable and fixed, and seldom found one whose speed stability is worse than 0.2%. This is equivalent to holding lip-sync over around 100 seconds.
al77
Posts: 256
Joined: Sun Jun 08, 2003 9:48 pm
Location: NW UK
Contact:

Post by al77 »

i think the differences between the recording formats listed above pale in to insignificance if you don't have both:
- a good sound man, to make use of that dynamic range.
- & a good quality mic

also do you really need 3 audio tracks?
usually i'd record dialogue in mono leaving the other track for sync.
do the things you want to be in stereo (ambience etc) actually need to be recorded dead in sync? just match it up in post?
User avatar
monobath
Senior member
Posts: 1254
Joined: Wed Jan 22, 2003 7:11 am
Real name: Skip
Location: 127.0.0.1

Post by monobath »

I have a Sony Walkman MZ-RH10 HiMD recorder. I'm on my second unit. The first one was DOA with respect to recording capability. All other functions were fine. The second one seems to be working OK.

I don't think this is a well-built device at all. Definitely nothing approaching professional quality. It is a cheap toy.

It is mostly plastic. It seems very delicate. It uses a weird gumstick battery. It is slow to start recording because it has to index to the next free location. The controls are pathetic. The menu system is slow to navigate through, very tedious. Each time you select an end option on a menu, it resets back to the beginning of the menu system instead of back one level.

Sound quality is fine to my non-discriminating ability to judge. But the device is really a piece of consumer gadget crap. I shoulda bought a Marantz PMD670. This little toy is a lot cheaper than a PMD670, but it was a waste of money in retrospect, so no real savings after all.
supermag400_inventor
Posts: 318
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 7:29 am
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Contact:

Post by supermag400_inventor »

I find these comments very interesting. I will now really evaluate what to buy. I was thinking of the Sony Hi MD but now I must reconsider my options. Perhaps a good old fasion Radio Shack handy tape deck would work as well. Much cheeper!
christoph
Senior member
Posts: 2486
Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2003 2:36 pm
Location: atm Berlin, Germany

Post by christoph »

we discussed this topic in a thread just a few months ago (fires up a complex search)...

viewtopic.php?t=8455&highlight=nagra+marantz+christoph

++ christoph ++
Post Reply