All:
I'm sharing some behavior I've seen recently and wanted to get a consensus. I certainly don't want to beat a dead horse, but I am seeing some results that I didn't fully expect. I wanted to see if everyone else had the same experience.
I have had several films that I've shot on a variety of film stocks, developed and transferred on Pro8's Millennium 2 HD scanner. Consistently I have seen the following:
1: 64T is very jittery. Every roll I shoot is noticeably jumpy, more so in the scan since it's so clear. It's not as easy to see when it's projected, but it's there.
2: Tri-X is somewhat jittery. This isn't as detectable, but you can see it jump if you're looking for it.
3: Negative stock : Solid as a rock.
It was my understanding that negative stocks were somewhat thicker than reversal? I will double check my homework. I'm shooting on a 1014XL-S which is in prime shape. It seems as though, even though the torque is solid, it's really fine tuned for the negative tension and thickness.
Additionally, I have started using energizer lithium batteries, which clearly pack a big punch. The battery meter registers quite a bit more juice than your average battery.
Camera Torque with 64T, Tri-X, and Negative...
Moderator: Andreas Wideroe
- adamgarner
- Posts: 312
- Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 3:20 pm
- Location: Austin TX
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 76
- Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 5:43 pm
- Location: London, UK
- Contact:
Re: Camera Torque with 64T, Tri-X, and Negative...
Hi;
Not sure about 200T but 500T is actually pretty thin! Thinner than most reversal stocks available, more like K40.... I had a major problem with a ZMII that would not advance any neg stock but would reversal, got it serviced since and it's great now.
Not sure about 200T but 500T is actually pretty thin! Thinner than most reversal stocks available, more like K40.... I had a major problem with a ZMII that would not advance any neg stock but would reversal, got it serviced since and it's great now.
Re: Camera Torque with 64T, Tri-X, and Negative...
Adam,
I'm glad you brought this up. I have a few NIKONs that shoot steady footage,
no matter what films I use. Yet, I had a Minolta that would get jitters with reversal. PRO8MM adjusts the torque on the cameras that they sell/rent.
Does anyone know of a mad scientist dude that can make those adujstments
to Super 8 cameras? I'm thinking of Bernie at super16inc.com, but he stays crazy busy.
I'm glad you brought this up. I have a few NIKONs that shoot steady footage,
no matter what films I use. Yet, I had a Minolta that would get jitters with reversal. PRO8MM adjusts the torque on the cameras that they sell/rent.
Does anyone know of a mad scientist dude that can make those adujstments
to Super 8 cameras? I'm thinking of Bernie at super16inc.com, but he stays crazy busy.
- S8 Booster
- Posts: 5857
- Joined: Mon May 06, 2002 11:49 pm
- Real name: Super Octa Booster
- Location: Yeah, it IS the real thing not the Fooleywood Crapitfied Wannabe Copy..
Re: Camera Torque with 64T, Tri-X, and Negative...
Films measured:
Kodak:
PLUSX:0.140mm ("new" not processed)
E64: 0.155mm (not processed)** new
K40: 0.145mm (processed)
K40: 0.145mm (not processed)
K25: 0.145mm (processed) *
K25: 0.145mm (not-processed) *
VNF: 0.150mm (processed/not-processed = same)
V200T: 0.165mm (not processed)
V2 200T: 0.155mm (not processed)
E160: 0.130mm (processed)
E50D: 0.155mm (processed)
V250D: Later
V500T: Later
Kodachrome II (R8): 0.145mm (not processed)
Fuji:
F500T: 0.150mm (processed)
F400D: 0.150mm (processed)
RT200N: 0.100mm (processed)*
R25N: 0.100mm (processed)*
Agfa:
A40: 0.145mm (not processed)
A160: later
Fomapan
Fomapan: 0.145mm (processed)*
Fomapan: 0.145mm (not processed)*
..tnx for reminding me Michael Lehnert.... or Santo or.... cinematography.com super8 - the forum of Rednex, Wannabees and Pretenders...