Anyone Else Who Edits / Sound Edits The Film Original?
Moderator: Andreas Wideroe
- S8 Booster
- Posts: 5857
- Joined: Mon May 06, 2002 11:49 pm
- Real name: Super Octa Booster
- Location: Yeah, it IS the real thing not the Fooleywood Crapitfied Wannabe Copy..
Anyone Else Who Edits / Sound Edits The Film Original?
Just wondering if I am totally outdated?
I edit, post stripe & sound edit them and edit the sound from there for direct projection.
Anyone else who does this around here? (Apart from Pedro and Old Uncle Barry)
R
I edit, post stripe & sound edit them and edit the sound from there for direct projection.
Anyone else who does this around here? (Apart from Pedro and Old Uncle Barry)
R
Last edited by S8 Booster on Fri Nov 28, 2003 8:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.
..tnx for reminding me Michael Lehnert.... or Santo or.... cinematography.com super8 - the forum of Rednex, Wannabees and Pretenders...
Editing
I edit film too, it is a completley different and unique experience when cutting film, though these days few people do it.
Most of the time I don't edit the camara original. I tend to work on a workprint. I copy the original film frame by frame via my projector (which has an enlarged gate so I dont miss any of the image) and camera. Its not that difficult and it doesn't take that long, plus the quality is pretty good.
It is this copy that I work on with my editor. I only edit the original when I am absoultly sure about the cut. A bit like neg cutting - think.
The only drawback is the length of time, it takes about 2 weeks for the original film to be processed and a further two weeks to get the copy processed.
Pj
Most of the time I don't edit the camara original. I tend to work on a workprint. I copy the original film frame by frame via my projector (which has an enlarged gate so I dont miss any of the image) and camera. Its not that difficult and it doesn't take that long, plus the quality is pretty good.
It is this copy that I work on with my editor. I only edit the original when I am absoultly sure about the cut. A bit like neg cutting - think.
The only drawback is the length of time, it takes about 2 weeks for the original film to be processed and a further two weeks to get the copy processed.
Pj
OF COURSE!!!
It's the best of the super8 format!!
I edit it with a GOKO RM-8008 and a Bolex splicer. I transfer it with my Workprinter, edit the sound on the PC, stripe the film and transfer the sound to it.
If I need a complex editing, I make the PC cut first and then re-do it on the film. Nothing compares to a good projection of the original!
It's the best of the super8 format!!
I edit it with a GOKO RM-8008 and a Bolex splicer. I transfer it with my Workprinter, edit the sound on the PC, stripe the film and transfer the sound to it.
If I need a complex editing, I make the PC cut first and then re-do it on the film. Nothing compares to a good projection of the original!
Marc
I edit with a Wurker splicer for S8mm, and a Kodak butt splicer for regular 8. I use my originals. I never make prints or copies of my films. I never shoot with negative stock either.
I use a Minette viewer, they are superb.
I don't use sound, except while playing a CD or tape while the film is projecting.
I don't think I would ever want to edit on a computer. I like working with my hands and sitting down for long periods of time with my Minette and splicer is a thoroughly enjoying experience....
Tod
I use a Minette viewer, they are superb.
I don't use sound, except while playing a CD or tape while the film is projecting.
I don't think I would ever want to edit on a computer. I like working with my hands and sitting down for long periods of time with my Minette and splicer is a thoroughly enjoying experience....
Tod
- S8 Booster
- Posts: 5857
- Joined: Mon May 06, 2002 11:49 pm
- Real name: Super Octa Booster
- Location: Yeah, it IS the real thing not the Fooleywood Crapitfied Wannabe Copy..
Thanks guys. Then I am not a totally Super-lunatic 8mm Alienated [Alien] - after all
Suprisingly many I´d say.
Thanks for your feedbacks - all of you.
R
Suprisingly many I´d say.
Thanks for your feedbacks - all of you.
R
Last edited by S8 Booster on Fri Nov 28, 2003 8:51 pm, edited 3 times in total.
..tnx for reminding me Michael Lehnert.... or Santo or.... cinematography.com super8 - the forum of Rednex, Wannabees and Pretenders...
-
- Posts: 309
- Joined: Fri Nov 28, 2003 12:52 am
- Real name: Pavan Deep Singh
- Location: England
- Contact:
I believe when editing film/cutting film whether its the original or a copy, can add to the creative process.
It can be a slow process, but then that that in itself can be beneficial, you learn a kind of dicspline, a structured approach, something in my view you dont necessarily get when working with computers - Hope I am making sense.
Pj.
It can be a slow process, but then that that in itself can be beneficial, you learn a kind of dicspline, a structured approach, something in my view you dont necessarily get when working with computers - Hope I am making sense.
Pj.
-
- Posts: 8356
- Joined: Wed May 15, 2002 1:31 pm
- Location: Gubbängen, Stockholm, Sweden
- Contact:
sort of. i learned editing on tape to tape video system and steenbecks, and i like to think that made me a better and more structured editor when i moved to computers. however, you're going to have to adapt to that working style even if you started on a computer. very few working editors use much of the trial and error approach that the computer initially invites you to. it just takes too much time and doesn't give you as good results since the creativitiy is lost when the editor becomes a viewer instead of a storyteller.Pj wrote:It can be a slow process, but then that that in itself can be beneficial, you learn a kind of dicspline, a structured approach, something in my view you dont necessarily get when working with computers - Hope I am making sense.
/matt
-
- Posts: 355
- Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2003 1:57 am
At Film-Thurso we are working on our own contact printer (just got to get the lamp brightness sussed) because our preference is to copy camera-original material then edit the reprint for final copy-print for screening with full soundtrack. Part of our current production process includes 65mm PIP format material. This is an in-house photographic interprint system used for transferring special effects from PC back to super 8mm.
Also on our project list is Digital surround sound for super 8mm without huge modifications to projection equipment. A process has been devised and hopefully tests will be carried out before the end of December.
As much as possible everything is done on film.
Also on our project list is Digital surround sound for super 8mm without huge modifications to projection equipment. A process has been devised and hopefully tests will be carried out before the end of December.
As much as possible everything is done on film.