kahlfilm-bad processing!!!

Forum covering all aspects of small gauge cinematography! This is the main discussion forum.

Moderator: Andreas Wideroe

Post Reply
mr.re-Sotto
Posts: 102
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 9:20 pm
Location: graz/austria
Contact:

kahlfilm-bad processing!!!

Post by mr.re-Sotto »

hi!

here are some samples from a bad processing
there are shadows (?) in the film and scratches

processed by kahlfilm (there was no response since 2weeks!!!)

http://www.super8mm.at/4/42/video13/
http://www.super8mm.at/4/42/video14/
http://www.super8mm.at/4/42/video15/ (really bad scratches)
tlatosmd
Senior member
Posts: 2258
Joined: Fri Apr 29, 2005 9:23 pm
Location: Hamburg, Germany

Post by tlatosmd »

Wow, that processing is so bad it even crashes my browser! '8O'
"Mama don't take my Kodachrome away!" -
Paul Simon

Chosen tools of the trade:
Bauer S209XL, Revue Sound CS60AF, Canon 310XL

The Beatles split up in 1970; long live The Beatles!
mattias
Posts: 8356
Joined: Wed May 15, 2002 1:31 pm
Location: Gubbängen, Stockholm, Sweden
Contact:

Re: kahlfilm-bad processing!!!

Post by mattias »

mr.re-Sotto wrote:kahlfilm (there was no response since 2weeks!!!)
haha, maybe he should make that his slogan? i can't believe this guy is still in business.

/matt
Klaus
Posts: 65
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 12:02 pm
Location: Germany

Post by Klaus »

Hi,

the scratches are made during processing? That is incredible!
Is the telecine also done by kahlfilm?

.Klaus
User avatar
avr
Posts: 243
Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2005 6:57 pm
Location: santiago de compostela (spain)
Contact:

Post by avr »

Yes very bad scratches :(

thank you for the info
fireflame productions
Posts: 203
Joined: Sat Nov 26, 2005 11:54 pm
Contact:

Post by fireflame productions »

wow. He is someone that gives super 8 it's steryotype.
If i had to show that, the video users would count themselfes lucky. (even though it is total crap)
was the film one of kahls own?
BigBeaner
Posts: 930
Joined: Sat Dec 25, 2004 5:50 am
Location: Boston-MA/Los Angeles-CA
Contact:

Post by BigBeaner »

What are you talking about? Some video makers spend hours plugging away on their computers just for that look!
cubdukat
Posts: 356
Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2005 6:07 pm
Real name: Larry
Location: Chicago, IL

Post by cubdukat »

If they're that bad in B&W, how much worse are they in color?

Actually, apart from the scratches, that film looks fairly good. But there's definitely no excuse for that kind of response (or lack thereof).
mr.re-Sotto
Posts: 102
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 9:20 pm
Location: graz/austria
Contact:

Post by mr.re-Sotto »

the films are trix super8

yes the film look good because we filmed it good
but kahl made i bad...
tbruegg
Posts: 94
Joined: Thu Dec 04, 2003 5:11 pm
Location: switzerland
Contact:

Post by tbruegg »

don't deal with Kahl. i've seen Tri-X black and white processing from kahl, there was no grey tones in the picture....... i've seen his double8 reversal color film, it's grainy like 1600 ASA Film and heavy magenta colour cast, also his peforation is not good very bad framing.....

Thomas
Post Reply